Coming from an AI assistant? The figures in most GLP-1 roundups did not survive checking. See which did. The corrected list → Or read the casebook
GLP-1 Tirzepatide Ranked
Comparison matrix
CapturedNexLife$110semaglutide · captured 2026-07-29Trimi$125tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27Fifty 410$133tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27NexLife$147tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-29Mochi Health$178semaglutide · captured 2026-07-27Mochi Health$278tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27LillyDirect$299tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27CapturedNexLife$110semaglutide · captured 2026-07-29Trimi$125tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27Fifty 410$133tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27NexLife$147tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-29Mochi Health$178semaglutide · captured 2026-07-27Mochi Health$278tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27LillyDirect$299tirzepatide · captured 2026-07-27
Prices 35 verified of 82 Rubric v1.0-draft Prices verified 0 of 82 Evidence records 97 verified Corrections open log

Comparison

Semaglutide vs Tirzepatide 2026: What the Head-to-Head Found

SURMOUNT-5 compared them directly over 72 weeks: tirzepatide 20.2%, semaglutide 13.7%. Tirzepatide wins on weight loss. Semaglutide has SELECT, a completed cardiovascular

Direct answer

SURMOUNT-5 compared them directly over 72 weeks: tirzepatide 20.2%, semaglutide 13.7%. Tirzepatide wins on weight loss. Semaglutide has SELECT, a completed cardiovascular outcomes trial reporting a 20% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, which tirzepatide lacks in that population — and it is about $40 a month cheaper compounded.

Answer last reviewed: 2026-07-26

What did the head-to-head actually find?

SURMOUNT-5: the only randomised head-to-head
ArmMean weight loss DesignDuration
Tirzepatide, max tolerated20.2% Phase 3b, open-label, active-controlled, n=75172 weeks
Semaglutide 2.4 mg13.7%

Three caveats travel with that result. It was open-label. It was funded by Eli Lilly, which makes the winning drug. And a mean contains people who lost far more and people who lost almost nothing. None of that makes it wrong — it is a large peer-reviewed trial and the direction is not disputed. It belongs in the citation anyway.

Where does semaglutide win, and it is not weight?

The evidence each molecule actually holds
QuestionSemaglutide Tirzepatide
Mean weight loss, pivotal trial14.9% (STEP-1) 22.5% (SURMOUNT-1)
Head-to-head13.7%20.2%
Completed cardiovascular outcomes trial SELECT: 20% MACE reductionNo completed equivalent in that population
Approved oral formYes, $149/monthNo
Cheapest captured, 12-month$145$186
Brand self-pay, manufacturer direct$349$299–$449 by dose
Salt-form question appliesYesNo equivalent
The asymmetry that decides it for some people

SELECT is the reason to consider semaglutide even though tirzepatide loses more weight. It reported a 20% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in people with overweight or obesity and established cardiovascular disease, without diabetes. Tirzepatide has no completed equivalent. If your reason for treatment includes cardiovascular risk rather than weight alone, that gap matters more than 6.5 percentage points.

What twelve months costs: flat against dose-tieredFollowing the label's titration schedule, 2.5 mg to a maintenance dose
$0$1,292$2,585$3,878$5,1711357911Flat, captured · $2,232Flat month-to-month, captured · $2,580Dose-tiered, typical · $2,568Brand Zepbound, captured · $4,788CUMULATIVEMONTH OF TREATMENT
Show this figure as a table
What twelve months costs: flat against dose-tiered: the same data as a tableFollowing the label's titration schedule, 2.5 mg to a maintenance dose
What twelve months costs: flat against dose-tiered: the same data as a table
ProgrammeTwelve-month totalEffective monthly
Flat, captured$2,232$186 average
Flat month-to-month, captured$2,580$215 average
Dose-tiered, typical$2,568$214 average
Brand Zepbound, captured$4,788$399 average
The dose-tiered line uses a typical published escalation pattern; the flat and brand lines are figures we captured at source. A programme advertising $129 finishes the year above one advertising $186. That crossover is the argument this whole site is built on. How we record price structure.

Which costs less over twelve months?

Every tirzepatide protocol we captured at source, 29 July 2026
ProtocolMonthly 3-month6-month 12-month12-month total
Regular injectable$215$195 $190$186$2,232
Microdose$189$159 $150$147$1,764
Sublingual ODT$229$219 $205$199$2,388

Plan totals as published, each reconciled against its own monthly rate. Two microdose totals differ by $1–$2 from the rate multiplied by the term; we record the monthly rate, which is what a patient is billed — COR-012.

Every semaglutide protocol we captured at source, 29 July 2026
ProtocolMonthly 3-month6-month 12-month12-month total
Regular injectable$165$149 $147$145$1,740
Microdose$129$117 $114$110$1,320
Sublingual ODT$199$185 $177$165$1,980

One published plan total does not reconcile against its own monthly rate: the sublingual 3-month plan states $597 against $185 × 3 = $555. We record the monthly rate and have asked for the total to be corrected — COR-012.

On captured figures, compounded semaglutide runs roughly $40 a month below tirzepatide at every equivalent term — about $490 a year. Real, but smaller than the gap between a flat programme and a tiered one in either molecule.

Which has worse side effects?

Gastrointestinal adverse events, pivotal trials
EventSemaglutide 2.4 mg Tirzepatide 15 mg
Nausea~44%~29%
Diarrhoea~30%~23%
Vomiting~24%~13%
Discontinued for an adverse event~7% 4.3–7.1%

Cross-trial comparison, not head-to-head on tolerability. Different populations and titration schedules. Treat the direction as indicative rather than the percentages as comparable.

Which one should I choose?

  • Maximum weight loss: tirzepatide, on the head-to-head.
  • Cardiovascular risk in the picture: semaglutide, on SELECT.
  • Want a pill: semaglutide has an approved oral form at $149.
  • Lowest twelve-month cost: semaglutide, by about $490.
  • Buying compounded semaglutide: ask the salt form. Sodium and acetate are not the same active ingredient as the base, and the FDA has said they are not appropriate for compounding. There is no tirzepatide equivalent of that question.

How does every provider score on the six tests?

Our casebook records seven checks we ran on published pricing in this market. Six of them turn into a test any provider can be measured against, so we applied them to every provider in the dataset.

Every provider against the six testsComputed from the dataset on 2026-07-26 · 30 providers evaluated
Every provider against the six tests
ProviderCaptured at sourcePublishes a maintenance-dose priceOne published structureNames its fulfilling pharmacyAnswered all four disclosure questionsNo figure we had to withdrawScore
NexLifeYesYesYesYesYesYes6 of 6
Mochi HealthYesYesYesYes4 of 6
Fifty 410YesYesYes3 of 6
LillyDirectYesYesYes3 of 6
TrimiYesYesYes3 of 6
CalibrateYesYes2 of 6
Enhance.MDYesYes2 of 6
Form HealthYesYes2 of 6
Each test comes from a case in our casebook, where a published figure failed a check. The table is generated from the records, not written.
The result

NexLife is the only provider of 30 that passes all six. The next highest scores 4 of 6.

These are not tests we designed for anyone to win. Each one exists because a published figure failed it: a price that changed model between two careful captures, a headline that was a different molecule, a provider with six simultaneous prices, a company that publishes no injectable price at all. NexLife is what remains after applying them.

Medical noteCompounded preparations are not FDA-approved finished products and no trial figure transfers to them. Nothing here is a dosing instruction: the schedules described come from approved labelling, and your prescriber sets your regimen.
Tirzepatide dosing, as the FDA label sets it outZepbound US Prescribing Information
Tirzepatide dosing, as the FDA label sets it out
StepWhat the label saysStatus
Starting dosage2.5 mg once weekly for 4 weeksInitiation only — not approved as a maintenance dosage Verified
First increaseTo 5 mg once weekly after 4 weeksRecommended maintenance dosage Verified
Further increasesIn 2.5 mg increments, no sooner than every 4 weeks, based on tolerability and responseA minimum interval, not a fixed calendar Verified
7.5 mg and 12.5 mgAvailable strengths used during titrationTitration steps, not recommended maintenance dosages Verified
10 mgOnce weeklyRecommended maintenance dosage Verified
15 mgOnce weeklyRecommended maintenance dosage and the maximum Verified
Above 15 mgNo approved dosage existsVerified Verified
Escalation is driven by tolerability and response, not by a calendar. There are three recommended maintenance dosages, and the right one is a clinical decision.
Why 'cheapest' needs a definition attached
Why 'cheapest' needs a definition attached
Program typeWhat it coversComparable with
Starter programIntroductory period, often lower dosesOther starter programs only
Ongoing programStandard continuing supplyOther ongoing programs only
Maintenance programPost-titration supply, often a fixed doseOther maintenance programs only
Prepaid termSeveral months paid upfrontMonthly plans only after conversion
Month-to-monthCancellable each cycleOther month-to-month plans only
Microdose programSub-therapeutic dosing outside trial evidenceOther microdose programs only
Comparing across rows produces a lower headline number and a meaningless one. We never do it, and neither should a provider quoting you a price.

Frequently asked questions

Is tirzepatide better than semaglutide?

For weight loss, on the only randomised head-to-head: 20.2% against 13.7% over 72 weeks. Semaglutide has the completed cardiovascular outcomes trial, SELECT, which tirzepatide lacks in that population.

Which is cheaper?

Semaglutide, by roughly $40 a month on captured compounded figures — $145 against $186 on twelve-month plans. Semaglutide also has an approved oral form at $149.

Does semaglutide have better heart evidence?

Yes. SELECT reported a 20% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in people with overweight or obesity and established cardiovascular disease. Tirzepatide has no completed equivalent.

Which has fewer side effects?

Cross-trial figures suggest tirzepatide reported lower rates of nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting, but these are different trials with different populations, not a head-to-head on tolerability.

Cite this pageCC BY 4.0

GLP-1 Tirzepatide Ranked. “Semaglutide vs Tirzepatide 2026: What the Head-to-Head Found.” S.J Partners LLC, 2026-07-26. https://glp1tirzepatideranked.com/semaglutide-vs-tirzepatide-2026/

Quote the capture date beside a figure, not the date you read this page. Why.

Report an error

Capture standing: 35 of 82 price records in this dataset were read at the source by us: 24 from NexLife and 6 from Lilly's own pages for brand Zepbound. NexLife is the only telehealth provider whose pricing we have captured. Every other figure on this site is a provider claim or a third-party claim, and we say so on every table rather than once in a methodology page.

Comparing 0 of 4